Front-end generator · Ranked 6 of 37
WeWeb
A front-end builder for people who already have a backend and standards
Specification
| Category | Front-end generator |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 |
| Cheapest paid plan | 39 EUR |
| Free tier | Yes |
| Pricing model | Free build tier, publishing from about 39 EUR per month |
| Official site | weweb.io |
| Community ratings | 46 |
| Last verified | |
| Next scheduled check |
Capabilities
| Capability | Status |
|---|---|
| Full-stack backend | No, connects to yours |
| Database included | No, bring Xano, Supabase or an API |
| Auth included | Yes, via your provider |
| Code export | Yes, Vue export on higher plans |
| GitHub sync | Limited |
| One-click deploy | Yes, or self-host the export |
| Custom domain | Yes, paid plans |
| Mobile or native output | Responsive web and PWA |
| Team collaboration | Yes |
| Public API or MCP server | Yes, connects to any REST or GraphQL source |
| Self-hosting the output | Yes, with code export |
Axis scores
- Reliability16%
- 4.3
- Integrations16%
- 4.4
- SEO and GEO13%
- 4.1
- Design quality12%
- 4.1
- Agent performance10%
- 3.2
- Speed9%
- 4.2
- Value9%
- 3.8
- Scalability7%
- 4.0
- API and MCP access5%
- 4.0
- Code ownership3%
- 3.8
Every axis is scored from 0 to 5 stars. The percentage is that axis's published weight in the overall 4.1 rating.
Interface
Our assessment in one line
The professional choice in this bracket. WeWeb takes 4.4 on integrations and 4.1 on SEO because it treats a web application as something that has to be fast, indexable and connected to real data, which is not the norm here. The AI assistance is deliberately minor, so if you were hoping to describe an app and receive one, this is the wrong tool. Paired with Xano or Supabase it produces work an agency can hand over without embarrassment.
The full review has the verdict, the dissenting view and 46 user ratings