Internal tools platform · Ranked 32 of 37
Stacker
Client portals for consultancies, and not much else
Specification
| Category | Internal tools platform |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 |
| Cheapest paid plan | 59 EUR |
| Free tier | No |
| Pricing model | No free tier, paid plans from about 59 EUR per month |
| Official site | stacker.ai |
| Community ratings | 9 |
| Last verified | |
| Next scheduled check |
Capabilities
| Capability | Status |
|---|---|
| Full-stack backend | No, portal layer over a data source |
| Database included | Yes, or connect Airtable and Salesforce |
| Auth included | Yes, per-client permissions |
| Code export | No |
| GitHub sync | No |
| One-click deploy | Yes |
| Custom domain | Yes |
| Mobile or native output | Responsive web only |
| Team collaboration | Yes |
| Public API or MCP server | Limited |
| Self-hosting the output | No |
Axis scores
- Reliability16%
- 3.9
- Integrations16%
- 3.8
- SEO and GEO13%
- 2.5
- Design quality12%
- 3.6
- Agent performance10%
- 2.9
- Speed9%
- 3.5
- Value9%
- 3.0
- Scalability7%
- 3.0
- API and MCP access5%
- 3.1
- Code ownership3%
- 2.0
Every axis is scored from 0 to 5 stars. The percentage is that axis's published weight in the overall 3.3 rating.
Interface
Our assessment in one line
A narrow, competent product with an awkward price. Stacker does per-client permissions over an existing data source better than most, and the portals look respectable without design work. But it starts at 59 EUR with no free tier, the AI layer is thin, and Softr now does a broadly similar job for less. Worth a look if the permission model is genuinely the hard part of your problem. Otherwise there are cheaper routes to the same portal.
The full review has the verdict, the dissenting view and 9 user ratings