Head to head
FlutterFlow vs Rocket.new (2026)
FlutterFlow takes the overall rating, but this pairing is decided on axes rather than totals: FlutterFlow leads 7 of the ten, Rocket.new leads 2.
FlutterFlow
The serious answer for cross-platform mobile, if you can handle Flutter
4.0out of 5
The best mobile tool in this index by a clear margin. FlutterFlow generates genuine Flutter projects, exports the source on paid plans, and produces interfaces that look designed rather than generated, taking 4.3 on both design and integrations. The catch is that you inherit Flutter: web output is heavy and scores 2.8 on SEO, and debugging eventually means reading Dart. For an app that has to live in both stores from one codebase, nothing else here is close.
- Price from
- 30 EUR
- Best for
- Teams that need one codebase for iOS, Android and web with a real exit path to Flutter source
- Ratings
- 96
Rocket.new
Mobile-minded, web-capable, and still finding its footing
3.5out of 5
Buy only if mobile is the point. Rocket.new is the clearest answer in this index to a specific question: what if the output needs to be an app store app rather than a website? It generates Flutter and React Native targets from the same brief, the screens look genuinely native rather than a web page in a shell, and for a team with no mobile engineers that is a real shortcut. Everything else is mid-table or below. Reliability is shaky, the SEO axis score of 3.0 is the weakest here, and the credit model prices exploration higher than it should.
- Price from
- 16 EUR
- Best for
- Teams who need a credible mobile app prototype and do not have mobile engineers
- Ratings
- 19
What each one looks like
Axis by axis
The leader on each axis is set in bold. The weight column is what that axis contributes to the overall rating, so a win on reliability counts for more than five times a win on code ownership.
| Axis | Weight | FlutterFlow | Rocket.new | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16% | 4.3 | 3.3 | FlutterFlow |
| Integrations | 16% | 4.3 | 3.4 | FlutterFlow |
| SEO and GEO | 13% | 2.8 | 3.0 | Rocket.new |
| Design quality | 12% | 4.3 | 4.0 | FlutterFlow |
| Agent performance | 10% | 3.5 | 3.7 | Rocket.new |
| Speed | 9% | 4.1 | 4.1 | Tied |
| Value | 9% | 4.1 | 3.6 | FlutterFlow |
| Scalability | 7% | 4.2 | 3.2 | FlutterFlow |
| API and MCP access | 5% | 4.0 | 2.8 | FlutterFlow |
| Code ownership | 3% | 4.4 | 3.0 | FlutterFlow |
| Overall, weighted | 100% | 4.0 | 3.5 | FlutterFlow |
Axis definitions and the full weighting are on how we review. Both tools last verified 14 August 2026.
Where the capabilities differ
| Capability | FlutterFlow | Rocket.new |
|---|---|---|
| Full-stack backend | Yes, via Firebase or Supabase | Partial |
| Database included | Yes, through Firebase or Supabase | Yes, managed |
| Auth included | Yes | Yes |
| Code export | Yes, full Flutter source on paid plans | Yes, Flutter or React Native |
| GitHub sync | Yes, paid plans | Yes |
| One-click deploy | Yes, web and store builds | Yes, web target |
| Custom domain | Yes, for web output | Yes, paid plans |
| Mobile or native output | Native iOS and Android from Flutter | Yes, Flutter and React Native |
| Team collaboration | Yes, with real-time editing | Limited |
| Public API or MCP server | Yes, REST and GraphQL, plus MCP | Limited |
| Self-hosting the output | Yes, after source export | Partial |
Shaded rows are the ones where the two differ.
What each one costs
FlutterFlow
Free tier for building, paid plans from about 30 EUR per month
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | Free |
| Standard | 30 EUR |
| Pro | 70 EUR |
| Teams | 70 EUR |
Rocket.new
Free trial credits, paid plans from about 16 EUR per month, credits billed by generation
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | Free |
| Starter | 16 EUR |
| Pro | 42 EUR |
| Studio | Free |
Which one should you choose
Pick FlutterFlow if your project looks like teams that need one codebase for ios, android and web with a real exit path to flutter source. Its strongest axes in this pairing are reliability, integrations, design quality. Avoid it for anyone who needs a fast public website, or who has never met a widget tree.
Pick Rocket.new if your project looks like teams who need a credible mobile app prototype and do not have mobile engineers. Its strongest axes here are seo and geo, agent performance. Avoid it for web-first products, content sites, or anything where organic search is the growth channel.
And the dissenting notes, which we publish rather than average away: on FlutterFlow, The Spanish edition editor argued the learning curve is understated for non-developers, who often stall the first time a widget tree needs restructuring by hand. On Rocket.new, One panellist argued the overall score understates it because our weights punish a mobile tool: SEO and GEO carries thirteen percent, which is close to irrelevant for a product shipped through app stores. He proposed a use-case weighted variant. We declined for launch, because a single published weighting is what makes the index comparable, but the point is fair and we say so on the review page rather than burying it.
Frequently asked
- Is FlutterFlow better than Rocket.new?
- On our weighted overall rating, FlutterFlow scores higher: 4.0 for FlutterFlow against 3.5 for Rocket.new. Axis by axis it is closer than that sounds. FlutterFlow leads 7 of the ten axes, Rocket.new leads 2, and 1 are tied. The right choice depends on which axes you weight, not on which total is larger.
- Which is cheaper, FlutterFlow or Rocket.new?
- FlutterFlow starts at 30 EUR and Rocket.new starts at 16 EUR. Compare the pricing models rather than the entry price: FlutterFlow bills as free tier for building, paid plans from about 30 eur per month and Rocket.new bills as free trial credits, paid plans from about 16 eur per month, credits billed by generation.
- Can I move a project from FlutterFlow to Rocket.new?
- Only as far as code export allows. On the code ownership axis FlutterFlow scores 4.4 and Rocket.new scores 3.0 out of five, which reflects how much of the running application you can take with you and whether it still works once moved.
- Which one is better for search visibility?
- On the SEO and GEO axis, which we weight at 13 percent, FlutterFlow scores 2.8 and Rocket.new scores 3.0. That axis covers server rendered content, per route titles and canonicals, and whether the output is legible without JavaScript.